Sign in or 
Location: 3.9 Zephaniah Home
Discussion: Webpage Discussion
Category:
Discussion Forum /
General Discussion
Share this
timelessbeing |
43. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 8 2008, 8:46 AM EST
I need someone to confirm whether Leon's name as in NRIC is Heng Lei Kiat Leon or Leon Heng Lei Kiat. In the initial register it was Leon Heng etc, but in the 'updated' one she was passing around, it was Heng Lei etc. Rather confusing... Anyway I already swapped Swat's and Jeng Yang's position. 1 out of 4 found this valuable. Do you? |
tanjyr |
44. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 8 2008, 9:59 PM EST
Does it really matter which name is in the NRIC. We all know who Leon is right.
0
out of
3 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
boyofthefuture |
45. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 9 2008, 1:10 AM EST
Lol faster send me the details please......I need at least a day to print 31!! And yea we all know who leon is...just put it as Leon Heng Lei Kiat....it makes no diff 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
timelessbeing |
46. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 9 2008, 1:38 AM EST
I'm putting it in register order, so i need to know. And the names are as in the class register!
0
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
boyofthefuture |
47. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 9 2008, 3:43 AM EST
Ask Leon on msn then...or I ask for u :P
1
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
48. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 10 2008, 6:26 AM EST
I would like to suggest a change (this is the webpage feedback thread). Right now, anonymous users can post even without logging in. However, this has posed an irritation to many registered users who always forget to log in, thus accidentally posting as anonymous, after that logging in, giving an explanation, and spamming the place. This is irritating and troublesome to the poster and the viewers. However, not all is lost...THERE is an option to prevent anonymous visitors from posting. This would solve the current problems, but it would also be hostile to those who do want to post anonymously. I think that is not a problem though. I do not recall a single truly anonymous poster and of course they'd be so much better off with an account. So, I would like to activate this option, but I would like to hear feedback first. From everyone. Please vote. HAOALA VOTES YES. 2 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
haoala |
49. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 10 2008, 6:27 AM EST
"I would like...HAOALA VOTES YES."That was me. 2 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
tanjyr |
50. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 10 2008, 8:27 AM EST
I don't exactly think its a good idea because if you want people to participate and use this, we should allow them to post without getting an account.BUT, I do think that it doesn't really matter because they should get an account anyway. So I vote YES 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
tanjyr |
51. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 10 2008, 8:30 AM EST
I think that we should move the site statistics to another page because it makes the reader have to scroll really far down to reach the threads
1
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
timelessbeing |
52. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 10 2008, 8:43 AM EST
YES for Adriel's notion. It may encourage people to sign up for an account too :PAnd YES for Ryan's notion too. I find it irritating too. 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
boyofthefuture |
53. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 10 2008, 9:13 AM EST
LOL I think the Home page is rather cluttered...Can we compress everything? And ok Yes for Adriel's notion... 2 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
haoala |
54. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 11 2008, 5:39 AM EST
We have 16 users on this webpage. Until we reach more than half of the population voting YES (9), it will not change.Vote count: 4 Or...if Samuel Yee agrees, since he's the last major contributor who hasn't said yes. 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
timelessbeing |
55. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 11 2008, 6:35 AM EST
Not as if all 16 of the users actually read the threads consistently...
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
haoala |
56. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 11 2008, 7:41 AM EST
The change has been implemented. Thanks to all who voted! ;) And I found it useful in posting this.
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
boyofthefuture |
57. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 11 2008, 7:42 AM EST
Lol...and Clement, are u gonna send me the class list any time soon?
1
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
samuelanonymous |
58. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 11 2008, 8:23 AM EST
hah i couldnt post until now. 1) yeah i changed the thing 2) thanks for all the suggestions 3) do we want downloads e.g. ppts on the respective subject page or on the downloads page. this time our downloads page isnt as nice and professional 2 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
timelessbeing |
59. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 11 2008, 9:02 AM EST
Concerning uploading the Contact List here, I think we should NOT put it up here, cos apparently we have some unwelcomed visitors from other classes looking at our website. It'll be better to send it to the email account instead.
0
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
haoala |
60. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 11 2008, 9:26 AM EST
"Concerning uploading the Contact List here, I think we should NOT put it up here, cos apparently we have some unwelcomed visitors from other classes looking at our website. It'll be better to send it to the email account instead."? uNWELCOME VISITORS? Do you find this valuable? |
|
boyofthefuture |
61. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 11 2008, 9:53 AM EST
Lol...like who? Can u even track anonymous visitors...lol?and why would other classes want to look at our stuff...there's nothing here that concerns them pretty much... 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
haoala |
62. RE: Webpage Discussion
Feb 11 2008, 9:58 AM EST
Actually, there is. Upcoming Tests/Exams, Subjects, CAS(L) etc.Esp Userpages ;) 0 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
